“What’s Between Your Legs?” Is the New “So What Do You Do in Bed?”: Trans Issues In The Media

April 1, 2014 ·

By Cathy Renna
@cathyrenna

Possibly inspired by Laverne Cox and Orange is the New Black, I blurted out the title of this post at a recent panel about media coverage of transgender issues, as I was trying to put into context the quality of coverage of transgender issues today, as compared to gay and lesbian issues in the early 1990s. It has stuck in my head since.

Back then I was working at GLAAD and gay and lesbian people were still seen by the mainstream media as one-dimensional. They asked questions that directly related to or skirted around our sex lives, because that’s what they thought their audiences wanted to know. They were probably right, for the most part, and it took a lot of time, education and activism to get the media to cover gay and lesbian issues — and people — more substantively.

For example, the coverage of the “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” policy when it began was more about showers and submarines than service. It was primarily about men, too, even if lesbians were discharged at a much higher rate. The guys made better, more sensational headlines. When DADT was repealed in 2010, the stories were, pun intended, an entirely different story. Because activists did a better job and because the culture and the media changed.

Which brings me to the swift, growing visibility for transgender people we are seeing in the media. Transgender characters in entertainment were always around, but as the punch line. When it came to news, it was usually about a hate crime. And I can tell you from personal experience even that coverage had to be fought for, from Brandon Teena to Fred Martinez to Gwen Araujo.

But increasingly, we are seeing transgender actors, activists, filmmakers, politicians and people from every walk of life coming out and telling their stories. We just saw the first transgender-focused TEDTalk by Geena Rocero, who got an instant standing ovation as she finished.

The release of the groundbreaking “Injustice at Every Turn” report by the Task Force and the National Center for Transgender Equality in 2011 showed the media the devastating impact discrimination and violence have on transgender and gender non-conforming people and is now a reference point for data the media can go back to, which is a critical piece of educating the public.

Which brings me back to that panel at CUNY Graduate School of Journalism.

Of course, we talked about Piers Morgan’s recent ham-fisted and very unsatisfying interview with author and activist Janet Mock and the controversy afterward. In my opinion, the underlying tone and language he used were not even good journalism. He asked the same kind of leading questions he always does and botched the opportunity to explore the life of an amazing woman. And obviously, he did not have to point out repeatedly that she was assigned male at birth. But does it make him transphobic?

It is exactly the situation I see time and time again with journalists. They are not homophobic, they are homo-ignorant.

[pullquote align=”right”]Laverne’s response was worth a million sessions of “trans 101” not just because of what she said but how she said it. She was firm, confident and frankly pretty nice about it.[/pullquote]So let’s add “trans-ignorant” to the lexicon, especially for those who obviously simply need some education. As I explained to the students in the audience, that education ideally should happen BEFORE the coverage whenever possible and with some nuance after if necessary. Piers was shocked and then got defensive. Everybody loses.

I love the carrot and stick approach but some folks seem to forget the carrot and go right to taking the stick to someone who is making a mistake they don’t even realize is offensive. As someone who has taken the stick out plenty of times, I think discerning between intentional offense and simple ignorance is something we should do more.

Like Katie Couric. Her interview with actress Laverne Cox and model Carmen Carrera about their live and careers came to an awkward impasse when she asked them what some would call “the plumbing question.” Laverne handled it extraordinarily well, realizing it was an “educable moment.” And you could see that Katie realized the same thing as Laverne responded to her.

After it aired there was a lot of criticism of Katie Couric. She correctly called it an educable moment in her very public apology. Then her apology was criticized. C’mon, really? I think things went a little overboard and could even backfire. I wonder of Katie will think twice before doing anything on transgender issues again but my hunch is she would redouble her efforts to get it right. That said, I have a vision in my head of babies and bathwater, you get my point?

Full disclosure — I have worked with Katie Couric — and she gets gay and lesbian issues. And while surely an ally to transgender people and a great journalist to boot, she took the simple and common route of asking what she and her audience was probably thinking out of curiosity and ignorant of how that feels to the person being asked. Laverne’s response was worth a million sessions of “trans 101” not just because of what she said but how she said it. She was firm, confident and frankly pretty nice about it. I know it is painful to be on the receiving end of these questions. “Which one of you is the guy?” Umm, neither of us, that’s the point. Been there, done that.

So while we will definitely see ups and downs, much as we did with coverage of gay and lesbian issues, the interest I experience with journalists on trans issues is impressive and bodes well. I worked on Anderson Cooper’s daytime show where he devoted the entire program to transgender children and young adults. It was amazing. And it was hours and hours of work prior by a whole lot of people, including the families and experts, who answered every question the producers and Anderson had — before we went on air. And make no mistake, it is not about being an “ally,” it is about being a good journalist. I don’t work with clients who just want their name in the paper. My job is to work for fair, accurate and inclusive coverage (you can take the girl out of GLAAD, but not the GLAAD out of this girl) and it is our responsibility to help the media get it right.

And there are some amazing things on the horizon, as the transgender community and allies not only work with media to get it right, but make media themselves. Last weekend, the Trans 100 launched. In late May, the release of Trans Bodies, Trans Selves will bring an incredible new resource to transgender people much as Our Bodies, Ourselves did in 1971.

I know that my tendency is to see the glass half full. Surprising, given how long I have been doing this, but when you see people really do their best to get it right it keeps me going. As I said to the CUNY students, if I can get someone to say “I never thought about it that way,” I score it as a victory. And the beginning of a new way of thinking that will impact anything they do in the future.

Cathy is the Senior Vice President, Target Cue

Crossposted from the Huffington Post with permission.

Next Post

Lateral violence in the trans community

Lateral violence is displaced violence directed against one's peers rather that one's true adversaries. Our true adversaries are kyriarchy and all those who perpetuate it. We live in an interlocking system of oppression; one oppression built on top of another with its core…
Read
Previous Post

Transgender college student Andraya Williams humiliated by Piedmont campus police says enough is enough

Andraya Williams Subjected to discrimination, intimidation, humiliation and stonewalled by North Carolina Central Piedmont Community College (CPCC), transgender student Andraya Williams tells the TransAdvocate she's had enough. On March 19th, Ms. Williams was detained by a campus school guard while…
Read
Random Post

The preapocalyptic podcast!

We’re all doomed, so say the pundits… and we all know they never engage in hyperbole, right? Also, Dylan Forbis, the first out trans man to run for public office in Brazoria County, crashes the pod to update us about…
Read
Random Post

Podcast: When Disaster Hits Our Community

The TransAdvocate podcast crew discusses the way the trans community responds to natural disasters, plus a review of upcoming events. On the Pod: Cristan Williams, Robin Mack, and Alexis Melvin
Read
Random Post

Questioning ENDA: Since I'm On Moderation At Bilerico...

Apparently I'm on comment moderation at Bilerico even though I'm a former contributor and a verified user. So, I'll post my question to Dr Jillian Weiss here: Dr. Weiss, I'm kinda confused. You've said here that: I do not have…
Read
Random Post

So, I hear trans people recently invented this whole cis/trans thing…

Using the cis- and trans- taxonomy to reference gender behavior was used as early as 1914. The transgender community didn't invent its use, nor is its current use inconsistent with its use in 1914.  When discussing gender, cis simply means same and…
Read
  1. What’s between ur legs? Who is the girl in the relationship? Have you had surgery? When did you start “feeling” like a girl? How long did you live as a boy?

    It’s about the gender, stupid….the gender stupid…the gender stupid. Or like a hospital HR asked (saying they should have known better is the understatement of the millenium) and knowing that my ID showed F….”So when do you plan on using the female restroom? After SRS?” My reply: “I’ve never told anyone “what’s down there”. Or the “complaint” from the transphobic supervisor: “We have a complaint that you “go down the hill” for hormones.” My reply: “Down the hill? Why should I when there is a Kaiser just down the street?”

    The HR Dept located here: http://vvgmc.com/ Now if only they had been in California….oh wait a minute they are!!!! I figured that the “top 5” so-called trans legal/whatever groups would be of help. They were! “We’re so sorry that happened”. Ain’t no wonder I walk (and fight) my trans advocacy journey alone…and always will…..at least in this lifetime.

  2. “…she took the simple and common route of asking what she and her
    audience was probably thinking out of curiosity and ignorant of how that
    feels to the person being asked.”

    I’ve seen this used as an excuse or explanation many times by journalist over the years. But, then why don’t they ask that sort of question to paraplegics or say, co-joined twins? Why are trans people considered, “fair game” when it comes to really invasive and personal questions that posed to anyone else would be deemed “by the audience” as highly offensive? I smell a self serving narrative that the interviewers themselves have created, nurtured and re-use time and again…

  3. “Which one of you is the girl?”

    “That’s simple: I am. Isn’t it obvious?”

    Sincerely,
    – bonzie anne

    PS: Having to rebut the imposition of the Standard Gay Narrative as well as the Standard Transsexual Narrative on my selfhood is an annoyance… but I think I deal with people who aren’t bewitched by an ideology pretty well.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.