“Right to discriminate” bill supports KKK’s right to racial segregation says Sen Yarbrough’s office

February 21, 2014 ·

By Cristan Williams
@cristanwilliams

Arizona state senator, Steve Yarbrough (R) sponsored Senate Bill 1062, hailed as a “property rights” bill aimed at ensuring that business owners and social service organizations would have the right to discriminate on the basis of religious freedom. Devon Mills, speaking for Yarbrough’s office said, “It allows business owners to use religion as a reason to deny someone business if it conflicts with their religious belief.”

Arizona Democrats, who argue the legislation is a way to legalize discrimination against LGBT individuals, sponsored eight amendments in an attempt to thwart the legislation — all of which were rejected by Senate Republicans.

“SB 1062 permits discrimination under the guise of religious freedom,” state Senate Democratic Leader Anna Tovar said in a statement Wednesday. “With the express consent of Republicans in this Legislature, many Arizonans will find themselves members of a separate and unequal class under this law because of their sexual orientation. This bill may also open the door to discriminate based on race, familial status, religion, sex, national origin, age or disability.”

As testament to the bill’s mission, state Sen. Steve Yarbrough (R), one of three lawmakers sponsoring the bill, cited a 2013 New Mexico Supreme Court ruling that banned wedding photographers from refusing to shoot same-sex ceremonies, according to the Associated Press. – HuffPo

After hearing about the various ways Yarbrough’s bill supports bigotry, I called his office to get the skinny on precisely how bigoted Yarbrough is willing to be:*

Cristan Williams: “I understand that this is basically a property owner rights [bill]. If a gay couple, or something like that, came in a restaurant and I as a restaurant-owner didn’t endorse that lifestyle, I wouldn’t have to serve them, I wouldn’t have to have those customers at my store. I wouldn’t risk being sued over [my discrimination], correct?

Yarbrough’s Office: “If you could object to someone coming in, if it was based on a religious objection, that is correct.”

CW: “Organizations like the Klan are explicitly religious organisations. If you had a racist person who was part of [the KKK], if it was their sincere belief that the curse of Ham is correct, [do these] bills open the door to segregation again. Correct?”

YO: “If one could prove that preforming an action or an action is motivated by that belief, the belief severally held, and if they did that it would substantially burden their beliefs, then yes, that is correct.

It’s no surprise to find that Arizona Rep. John Kavanagh (R) supports a move in this direction for his state. “All this bill does is protect the religious freedom that the people who began this country came here to establish,” Kavanagh said. I debated Kavanagh when he attempted to pass a bill that would ban trans people from using restrooms. When I spoke with Monica Roberts about this story she reminded me, “All oppressions are linked.”

bobslide6[1] Intersectionality, a fun guide

The same folks who’ve made a career out of attacking LGBT people are in favor of a bill they know will empower hate groups like the Klan. “This is a license to discriminate,” said EJ Montini of The Arizona Republic. “It essentially will allow people to refuse service to people who may be gay or be of other religions.” As to other groups that are at risk Montini said, “There could be a lot of exposure in this particular bill.” Driving home the bigoted roots of this bill, he continued, “This is extremists in the Legislature essentially appeasing zealots out in the community, it’s really a shame.”

[hr]

*When I do fact-checking and want a bigoted person or system to be a little more honest about their feelings and motivations, I generally call them up and truthfully identify myself as calling from Houston, TEXAS. I sometimes add a bit of an East Texas twang and/or vernacular in there too. Thus far, I’ve not been disappointed in the assumptions people draw about me being a Texan; people/systems feel fairly comfortable opening up to me.

[hr] [column size=”one-half”]

Tip this TransAdvocate!

Writers for the TransAdvocate work hard to bring you news and commentary. If you found this article meaningful, let the author know that you appreciate the work they do with a tip!
[/column] [column size=”one-half” last=”true”] TipJar

[/column]
Next Post

A Look Back at the T in the 1979 “Gay March” on Washington

Official Souvenir Program of the 1979 National March on Washington, Page 40 It should be noted that the organizer of the 1st MOW was Ray Hill from Houston, Texas. Hill was a significant supporter of both trans inclusion and trans…
Read
Previous Post

Trans medical care = mutilation?

A reader writes: I was wondering if it would be possible to open a discussion seeking articulation explaining why and how surgical alteration is different from genital mutilation. I feel insufficiently equipped to defend the difference. Here's the deal: body…
Read
Random Post

Ask Matt: Life Insurance for Trans People

A reader writes: “I’m curious if, as a trans woman, I would be considered ‘higher risk’ with regard to life insurance than a non-trans woman, or would be expected to calculate my risks/premiums as male rather than female. “And if…
Read
Random Post

Unity, NOT Uniformity!

As you may know, most of the TS Separatist leaders have moved on with their lives and the ones who are left seem to be the Ashley Love/Just Jennifers of the world who regularly make absurd and demonstrably false claims.  I will continue to…
Read
Random Post

Gender Nation: Attacks of all sorts

Gender Nation is a bi-weekly column by Gwendolyn Ann Smith, the founder of the Transgender Day of Remembrance, reviewing news affecting the trans, intersex, and genderqueer community. Attacks of all sorts In what may set the tone for the 2018 midterm…
Read
Random Post

Rapid onset gender dysphoria and other myths

The anti-trans movement created a new pathology they're shopping around to various (mostly right-wing) news outlets. It's called "rapid onset gender dysphoria" and you catch it from websites like DeviantArt, Tumblr, and Reddit. A great takedown of this internet illness was…
Read
  1. Someone has to call them on this. Our nation has somehow gone from having a government that respects people’s religious beliefs to trying to place those beliefs – whatever they may be at the moment for a given individual – above the law.

    They want to be able to discriminate based on their religious beliefs. But religious beliefs are a choice. So, what this law really boils down to is they simply want the right to choose to discriminate.

  2. Arizona and other states are passing laws allowing for wholesale discrimination against gays and anyone whom people wish to discriminate against, so long as they can link it to their religion.

    I remember the videos of black children being barred from their schools by white bigots. I remember standing beside dying gay men as emergency workers let them bleed to death because they were afraid they might catch aids. I remember Matthew Shepard, found naked and tied to a fence in the snow, with his tears frozen to his face. I can’t live in a nation that takes the freedom away from itself and perpetuates the hatred and racism and homophobia into the next century.

    How many people stood by as blacks were told the restaurant counter or the bus or the bathroom was off limits by virtue of their race and wanted to say something but couldn’t? It’s hard to stand against a raging river, especially when you feel you are doing it alone. How long do we say nothing? Please, please take a moment to click a link and by doing so add your voice to the call for human decency in our nation. Take a stand against discrimination today.

    share it on facebook and twitter. We have 30 days to get 100,000 signatures to make the president read it.

    [Sign the petition](https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/stop-states-legalizing-discrimination/LNDzHTtq)

  3.  A Native American religion won a court case years ago allowing them to use peyote in their religious ceremony. It doesn’t allow them to force other people to use peyote. That’s the equivalent of what the Arizona legislature just did.

      1. We are going to go there *anyways* just send the bigots first so they can take all of the risks for us. Kind of like a penal colony.

        1. No. Just no. They don’t get to go to mars first just because they are twits. Why reward them for their behaviour?

          Now, however, I do believe we need a good crew to get some night time surface shots of the sun. It’s only dark half the night, so you gotta be quick while it’s dark…

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.