Less than Straights

May 14, 2006 ·

by Caillean McMahon

We are being openly defined as “less than” heterosexual couples by candidates for office. A “mother and a father” is the ideal family group that ought to be promoted by the state in their view.

In the circumstance where a couple divorces, and the custodial parent enters a same sex relationship, the children can be removed if this policy is pursued. The welfare of the child will be defined by the state’s overriding policy of children needing a father and a mother.

Gay and Lesbian parents will be just one step away from losing their children. This is not a dark fantasy conjured out of fear; it is the logical outcome of the policy and supported by the fact that in past decades this occurred with alarming regularity.

Many of you cannot imagine these things happening. The older members of the community can remember these things all too well. Our opponents in the 1970’s developed a policy and a strategy to take civil rights back to when these things were common, before any gay rights guarantees, before Roe, before Lawrence. They are anti-feminist, anti-gay and anti-dissent.

A mere decade ago anyone who called us diseased, disturbed, or dangerous to society would have been labelled an extremist. Now, even Democrats gingerly support what are reactionary positions tacitly furthering homophobia.

We have become a docile minority. Too many of us expect others to campaign for our rights. We are rapidly becoming inconsequential in politics because so many of us remain silent. We need to be heard; we need to, as gays and lesbians, support those candidates who support us and vocally oppose those candidates who would reduce us to second or third class status. We need to become a force and resource once again.

Gay partnership rights and gay adoptions are the major issues this year. If the reactionaries win the next elections will center around employment rights and protections from violence. How many rights are you willing to lose? Are your prepared to return to the shame and deceit of living in the closet? Unless we, as a community, begin to be heard and loudly, this is the fate that the reactionaries that oppose us intend for us. Read their sermons and literature. As opposed to our community, they have been quite loud and clear about what their idea for Pennsylvania, for America, is.

We are not a part of the future as they see it.

In category:Opinion
Next Post

Re-thinking Gay Image

by Caillean Maureen McMahon I'm old enough to remember. It does not seem that very long ago that Russian Orthodox leaders commanded the sympathy of the world as they attempted to keep their faith and practices alive in the face…
Read
Previous Post

The Gay Tax by Caillean Maureen McMahon

The Gay Tax Today, I had a moment of unusual clarity. Like a lightning bolt in the sky, the darkness of the tangled alliances and motivations involved in the opposition to same-sex marriage was illuminated for me and I finally…
Read
Random Post

Gender Nation: State health case could have national ramifications

Gender Nation is a bi-weekly column by Gwendolyn Ann Smith, the founder of the Transgender Day of Remembrance, reviewing news affecting the trans, intersex, and genderqueer community. State health case could have national ramifications The state of Wisconsin may have violated…
Read
Random Post

RadFem Speak Out Against TERFs!

So, who’s heard of Julie Burchill and her “censored” article? Coming to the defense of her maligned feminist friend, columnist and author Julie Burchill wrote an article about trans women. Apparently, her friend Suzanne Moore’s latest article contained a faux…
Read
Random Post

Transphobic Jokes, Context, and the Free Speech Canard

Recently comedian Vicky Wagner posted this on social media: When criticized, she said: "I appreciate your opinion but Caitlyn had 65 years exp being a man in a man's world. She had male privilege. Has nothing to do with respect.…
Read
Random Post

Memo to Proven Liar Victoria Brownworth

A former Cincinnati Bengals cheerleader won her defamation lawsuit against a gossip website and its operator, with a jury awarding her $338,000 in damages Thursday. Jurors in federal court in Covington found that posts about Sarah Jones on the Scottsdale, Ariz.-based website thedirty.com in 2009…
Read