Socialize

FacebookTwitterRSS

The Trans-Exterminationism Behind the Circular Rhetoric, the Fifth Column, the Kool-Aid and the Quislings

We’ve seen this:

But in the first image, note that phrase under ‘likes’ that’s truncated: ‘The Transsexual…’

I wonder what it could possibly be that the poodle purveyors could possibly like?

I wonder who else likes what…

and…

and…

and…

and…

and…

Well, when I see  this:

I remember this:

 

I guess it all depends on what the definition of ‘exterminate’ is, eh?

In OUR view, MtFs are still MEN because they were SOCIALIZED as men….
- “Undercover Punk” (a/k/a/Bess Hungerford)

Extermination of personal, social and – because there is no way for it not to follow - legal identity…

with a kool-aid aperitif…

all served on a U.N. placemat.

[Cross-posted at ENDABlog]

Related content:

  1. This is Why Trans People in Maryland Can’t Have Nice Things
  2. History! Repeated! Maryland Trans People Fucked Again!
  3. The Susan G. Komen Controversy Has Me Thinking About Un-Democratic Marketing-Primacy Monsters Masquerading as Charities and Not Giving a Damn About the Real People Who They Claim to Give a Damn About
  4. Oh the Irony….
  5. …Though, to be Fair, Probably Not as Much as HRC Has
Better Related Posts Plugin
Transadvocate contributor: Kat  (208 Posts)


  • valeriekeefe

    Is it just me or is the self-appointed cissexist dyke-bashing contingent getting really old? I don’t mean  median age, though that’s true, it’s just… they haven’t had a new joke since Whipping Girl.

    • http://marjaerwin.livejournal.com/ Marja Erwin

      (Trigger Warning)

      There’s the bit where they accuse Julia Serano of appropriating rape imagery to describe her own experiences. But they never trouble themselves about, for example, Janice Raymond appropriating rape imagery to dehumanize us.

      There’s the “Go anywhere… I don’t care where” nonsense. I think that only encourages the politicians who say they would kill us for using the bathroom.

  • http://www.facebook.com/daviddweintraub David Weintraub

    Because of my comment here yesterday, Cathy Brennan has tried to post on my facebook wall, private messaged me, and sent me an email with an inexplicable list of links she got by googling me. Or maybe not entirely inexplicable – she included one with what she thinks is my home address.

    Here are a couple of tips for you, Cathy (since you’re reading this): 

    1) When other people – especially people who would otherwise be your strongest allies – find cause to compare you with Lou Sheldon, it’s time to take a good, long, critical look at your behavior.

    2) If your own identity depends on your ability to define and control the identities of other people, the problem is with you, not them.

    • Kat

      David, your second observation reminds me a bit of the fake warning label that Frank Zappa began putting on his records after Tipper Gore and the PMRC got up a head of steam in the mid 1980s as undeserved as what Janice Raymond got in 1979 and what Brennan, Hungerford and their acolytes are attempting to get now:

      WARNING/GUARANTEEThis album contains material which a truly free society would neither fear nor surpress.In some socially retarded areas, religious fanatics andultra-conservative political organizations violate your First Amendment Rights by attempting to censor rock & roll albums.  We feel that this is un-Constitutional and un-American.As an alternative to these government-supported programs (designed to keep you docile and ignorant), Barking Pumpkin is pleased to provide stimulating digital audio entertainment for those of you who have outgrown -the ordinary-.The language and concepts contained herein are GUARANTEED NOT TO CAUSE ETERNAL TORMENT IN THE PLACE WHERE THE GUY WITH THE HORNS AND THE POINTED STICK CONDUCTS HIS BUSINESS.This guarantee is as real as the threats of the video fundamentalists who use attacks on rock music in their attempt to transform America into a nation of check-mailing nincompoops (in the name of Jesus Christ).If there is a hell, its fires wait for them, not us.

      My own disclaimer at the conclusion of this comment is directed not at you but, well…, I imagine you can guess.

      SADLY NECESSARY DISCLAIMER: This comment is peaceable activity intended to express a political view and/or to provide information to others; any other purpose is not simply imaginary but is the product of a disordered mind.

    • Kathleen

       The home address was in no way meant to threaten you……it was meant to reassure you. It shows she truly cares.

      By the by – if you live within the diaper clad, nonstop driving distance – you might want to upgrade to a dog. Cats are nice, but they provide less assurance when unexpected guests show up looking for box of personal care wipes while assuring you of their Purity of Essence.

      • http://www.facebook.com/daviddweintraub David Weintraub

        Fortunately, as a gay man living in rural Virginia, I am prepared for such visits. The NRA sticker next to “Value ALL Families” is no accident.

        • Kathleen

          Hey – your comments are back!
          Could some Pampered individual have taken issue with their discomforting rash behavior being aired? Depends.

          Glad you’re taking care of your safety – there’s enough nuts out there. After being shot at years ago I considered the same. I guess I’ll just get by with the Louisville Slugger by my door, going to need it with the season starting anyway.

          Huggies

      • http://translegalhistorian.wordpress.com/ Kat

        I actually tend to envision that exterminationism twin with a diaper on her head – and pencils up her nose…
         
        whilst shouting “Wuubul!!” at the top of her lungs.
         
        SADLY NECESSARY DISCLAIMER: This comment is peaceable activity intended to express a political view and/or to provide information to others; any other purpose is not simply 
        imaginary but is the product of a disordered mind.

  • Kathleen

    Do they explain why you sent David his home address? Are you saying it’s unreasonable to consider it a threat?

    Would you consider it such?

  • Kathy

    A. “Cathy Brennan has tried to post on my facebook wall, private messaged
    me, and sent me an email with an inexplicable list of links she got by
    googling me. Or maybe not entirely inexplicable – she included one with
    what she thinks is my home address.”

    B. “I forwarded David an email someone sent to me.”….”I didn’t read it.”

    It’s hard to see how you get to “C.” David is a liar. You are confirming what he said – you sent him something that appeared to be thought contain his home address. That it was in your hand isn’t something he stated.

    D. The link you provided goes to:

    “Error 404 – Not Found

    Sorry, but you are looking for something that isn’t here”

    E. No Profit. What point would you be trying to make by sending someone something where you didn’t have any idea of what the contents were? Even if true; you sent it and how would he know you’re in the habit of supporting assertions with random documents that you haven’t even read? Is that a standard practice for anyone?

    Posting a link that doesn’t refer to something that supports your statements – hell -  doesn’t refer to anything at all? What purpose does that serve?

    You may yet show David to be incorrect – but not with nonsense like this. If anyone should be concerned over being labelled a liar with the facts presented here – it’s not David.

    Try again.

  • Richard Cebull’s Agent

    I forwarded David an email someone sent to me.  Here it is below. I didn’t read it.

    • Kat

      Wow…looks like my keyboard has a hacking cough….