Bayard Rustin
"Our job is not to get those people who dislike us to love us"
bell hooks
“I will not have my life narrowed down. I will not bow down to somebody else's whim or to someone else's ignorance”
Susan Stanton has finally responded publicly to the fallout to horrible St. Petersburg Times article. Lou Chibbaro Jr. of the Washington Blade interviewed Stanton, saying:
‘Susan has said all along that she’s not like other transgender people,’ feature writer Lane DeGregory wrote in the St. Petersburg Times article. ‘She feels uncomfortable even looking at some, “like I’m seeing a bunch of men in dresses,” ‘ DeGregory quoted her as saying.
That quote triggered a firestorm of criticism from transgender bloggers, who said Stanton appeared to be perpetuating the stereotypes of transgender people that anti-gay and anti-trans bigots use to put them down.
She said the intensity of the hostility she received from transgender people was ‘far worse’ than the hostility she encountered from straights who demanded she be fired from her city manager’s job.
Her suggestion that transgender people have treated her worse than people demanding she be fired, is pretty outrageous. From Tampa Bay Online:
Steven Stanton was hired as a man for the people, this man just because he wants to wear a dress, he needs to stay out of the ladies room!He needs to either be fired or resign asap! I feel so sorry that he can get on TV and tell the Florida Public, but yet leaves his son in the dark that Dad is about to be no longer Dad! If he truly loves his son, then he would wait until his son was of age!
or
I feel horrible for the children & the wife! I hope God finds a way to help them get through this. As for the Freak Stanton, he should be fired asap from the City. You see, this is what happens in the PC world when you give Freaks like gays-lesbians rights. What is this guy wanted to marry a goat, then have a sex change operation to be a Goat, or a Dog, or a Cow.
or
I agree with the sentiments of the posts here. This man is truly a disturbed person and should not be given a platform to force his deviant behavior onto the rest of the world. His wife and children will have to live with his decisions forever. What about his young boy? Wow alot of therapy w/o the person who is he father, no matter what he wants to be. He will always be a man. That is how he was born.
That’s just a taste of how the “straight people” that wanted her fired, acted. I’m not sure how transgender people could have attacked her any more ferociously than the “straight” community.
But I’m not surprised by Stanton’s reaction. Being in transgender advocacy and having transitioned only a short 8 months ago, Stanton doesn’t take into account the tumultuous relationship of the transgender community and the Human Rights Campaign.
Stanton upset transgender activists and nearly all of the nation’s transgender rights groups by siding with Pelosi and Frank, saying she believed passing a gay-only version of ENDA as a “first step” would help open the way for passing a trans-inclusive bill. The House passed the gay-only measure in November by a vote of 235 to 184. Stanton’s association with HRC fueled criticism against her by many trans activists, who accused HRC of betraying the trans community by failing to oppose a non-trans-inclusive ENDA.
HRC spokesperson Brad Luna said Stanton spoke before HRC functions, including a board meeting, but that she has “no formal role” with the group.
Stanton went on to say that:
“The politics changed,” she said. “I know people want to take their ball and bat off the ball field. I think that’s a mistake. I do understand the anger with the Human Rights Campaign. But I also understand that, as someone who used to have to be responsible for making those types of decisions, sometimes you’ve got to be pragmatic and sometimes the importance of being at the table is in conflict with the need to have a sense of community.”Stanton said her years as a city manager, where she had to juggle competing political interests, made her acutely aware of the need for achieving objectives on an incremental basis rather than taking an “all-or-nothing” approach.
Not even former HRC Board member, Donna Rose, supported the HRC in their actions during the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) fiasco. If Stanton wants the transgender community to take her seriously, she should lay off the John Aravosis/HRC rhetoric. Calling the efforts of United ENDA as “all or nothing” is a tactic that was used during the ENDA debate to smear those who disagreed with Representative Barney Frank’s “pragmatic” approach. In light of comments after the ENDA vote of by Representative Tammy Baldwin (stating that we had the votes to pass 2015), the “all or nothing” language is simply propaganda. This rhetoric only fuels the idea that Stanton is a neophyte of the HRC, regardless of if she’s collecting a check.
Concerning the St. Petersburg Times article titled, “Susan Stanton’s lonely transformation”, she says:
‘Since the publication of this story, I have received hundreds of e-mails from people all over the nation expressing their disappointment and anger for the hurtful and insensitive statements that have been attributed to me,’ she wrote. ‘Simply stated, this article is not an accurate representation of my beliefs concerning the transgender community or my experiences as a transgender person.’
Being misquoted in a newspaper isn’t anything new. But Stanton hasn’t clarified what was false about the St. Petersburg Times article and hasn’t asked for a retraction. Without her doing so, the Blade interview raises more questions than it answers.