Socialize

FacebookTwitterRSS

Shit Bil Browning Says…And Doesn’t Say…And Apparently Will Never Say

 

We all remember this, right?

Yes we all do.

Really, we all do.

But some of us are apparently either trying to forget it or desperately hoping that everyone else will forget it.

So…for fuck’s sake, lets deal with some FACTS!

  • According to a Jan. 23, 2012 post in the website of Canada’s Xtra, Dan Savage made an appearance in Vancouver, British Columbia on Jan. 21.
  • According to the aforementioned Jan. 23, 2012 post in the website of Canada’s Xtra, Dan Savage was glitterbombed before that event.
  • According to the aforementioned Jan. 23, 2012 post in the website of Canada’s Xtra, a “group of six activists, who named themselves The Homomilitia for the event, said they confronted Savage as he entered the theatre through a back-alley entrance.”
  • The apparent pre-Savage-event ‘press release’ from The Homomilitia, dated Jan. 21, does not indicate who all, if anyone, with The Homomilitia is trans-anything or anything-anything.
  • That apparent ‘press release’ was not on a website identifiable as Homomilitia-specific.
  • The contact website listed on the apparent ‘press release’ is anti-Dan Savage but is not trans-specific and contains no posts for the eleven days prior to Savage’s Vancouver event.
  • According to the aforementioned Jan. 23, 2012 post in the website of Canada’s Xtra, those involved with the action against Savage in Vancouver listed six problems that they have with Savage, only one of which is trans-specific.
  • According to the aforementioned Jan. 23, 2012 post in the website of Canada’s Xtra, those involved with the action against Savage in Vancouver were “building on the work of trans activists and friends of trans people” invovled with previous actions against Savage.
  • The aforementioned Jan. 23, 2012 post in the website of Canada’s Xtra does not state that anyone involved with the action against Savage in Vancouver is trans-anything or anything-anything.
  • The aforementioned Jan. 23, 2012 post in the website of Canada’s Xtra contains one photo related to the event in Vancouver.
  • The aforementioned photo is not of anyone glitterbombing anyone but, rather, of a well-dressed, smiling woman handing out pamphlets.
  • The aforementioned Jan. 23, 2012 post in the website of Canada’s Xtra is one of only a handful of (perhaps as few as two) first-hand reports about the anti-Savage aspect of the event in Vancouver.
  • The only other first-hand report I have run across is from the Vancouver Media Co-Op and is dated Jan. 21.
  • The aforementioned Vancouver Media Co-Op piece dated Jan. 21 does not give the name of the group involved in the event in Vancouver, and only refers to them as “queer activists.”
  • The aforementioned Vancouver Media Co-Op piece dated Jan. 21 contains three photos: (1) “Dan Savage Glitterbombed”, which is a primarily a close-up image what one might presume to be a copy of the flyer handed out at the event, though also visible is part of might be a clothed leg; (2) “Dan Savage shortly after being glitter-bombed”, which is a man walking across an alley wherein the man’s face is totally obscured by the flash; (3) also entitled “Dan Savage Glitterbombed”, which is of a person – presumably other than the man who had been walking across the alley – standing outside what appears to be a partially-open door.
  • None of the aforementioned photos depict the act of glitterbombing.
  • Other than the image of Dan Savage reproduced on the flyer in the first photo, none of the aforementioned photos is an obvious image of Dan Savage.
  • On Jan. 23, 2012, Joe Jervis posted the following at Joe.My.God.: “Transgender Activists Glitter-bomb Dan Savage Again.”
  • Jervis’s only source underlying the events in Vancouver was the aforementioned Jan. 23, 2012 post in the website of Canada’s Xtra.
  • On Jan. 23, 2012, The John posted the following at AmericaBlog: “Trans activists glitterbomb Dan Savage again, this time because he supports marriage equality.”
  • The John’s only source underlying the events in Vancouver was the aforementioned Jan. 23, 2012 post in the website of Canada’s Xtra.
  • On Jan. 23, 2012, Bil Browning posted the following at Bilerico: “Trans Mafia: Savage Glitterbombed Again.”
  • Browning’s only sources underlying the events in Vancouver was the aforementioned Jan. 23, 2012 post in the website of Canada’s Xtra and the aforementioned blog post by Joe Jervis, whose only source underlying the events in Vancouver was the aforementioned Jan. 23, 2012 post in the website of Canada’s Xtra.
  • On Jan. 23, 2012, Eric Dolan posted the following at Raw Story: “Transgender activists glitter bomb Dan Savage again
  • Dolan’s only source underlying the events in Vancouver was the aforementioned Jan. 23, 2012 post in the website of Canada’s Xtra.
  • On Jan. 24, 2012, Andy Towle posted the following at Towleroad: “Trans Activists Glitterbomb Dan Savage for, Among Other Things, Support of Marriage Equality.”
  • Towle’s only source underlying the events in Vancouver was the aforementioned Jan. 23, 2012 post in the website of Canada’s Xtra.
  • On Jan. 24, John Becker posted the following at Bilerico, accompanied by a reproduction of the famous photo of a French Nazi collaborator being executed by firing squad during World War II: “Dan Savage & the Circular Firing Squad
  • Becker’s only sources underlying the events in Vancouver was the aforementioned Jan. 23, 2012 post in the website of Canada’s Xtra, and the aforementioned item by Browning, whose only sources underlying the events in Vancouver was the aforementioned Jan. 23, 2012 post in the website of Canada’s Xtra and the aforementioned blog post by Joe Jervis, whose only source underlying the events in Vancouver was the aforementioned Jan. 23, 2012 post in the website of Canada’s Xtra.
  • On Jan. 25, 2012, The John posted the following at AmericaBlog: “How the gays defined ‘Santorum.’
  • In the aforementioned Jan. 25, post, The John again reiterates the alleged Vancouver-centric facts underlying his Jan. 23 post.
  • In the comments section of the aforementioned Jan. 25, post, The John is called out on the lack of substantiation for the allegation that trans people were involved in the Vancouver event and responds by saying that that simply doesn’t matter: “Every attack until now has been done by trans people, and the attacks are happening because the trans community decided to demonize Dan and make him public enemy number one.  So, yes, if you are responsible for motivating the people who attacked him, and they’re doing it in your name, and the previous attacks were done by you, then yes you are responsible for putting a stop to it”
  • On Jan. 27, Dan Avery posted the following at Queerty: “Stop Glitter-Bombing Dan Savage. He’s Not the Enemy.”
  • Avery’s only sources underlying the events in Vancouver were the aforementioned Jan. 23, 2012 post in the website of Canada’s Xtra and the aforementioned Raw Story item, whose only source underlying the events in Vancouver were the aforementioned Jan. 23, 2012 post in the website of Canada’s Xtra.
  • On Jan. 27, at 6:38 PM, Natasha Barsotti posts the following at Canada’s Xtra: “Queerty to defence of glitter-bombed Savage
  • Barsotti’s item repeated the claim that trans people were involved with the Vancouver events.
  • Barsotti’s only sources were the previous Xtra item and the aforementioned Queerty piece.
  • At 8:09 PM a comment is posted to Barsotti’s story pointing out the lack of substantiation for the claim that trans people were involved with the Vancouver events.
  • At 10:40 PM, Barsotti acknowledged the problematic nature of the claims that trans people were involved with the Vancouver events: “Thank you for pointing out my error. I double checked with the original reporter on the story and the activists were apparently queer, not specifically trans, though they highlighted Savage’s alleged transphobia among their concerns.”
  • On Jan. 29, 2012, Adam Polaski posted the following at Bilerico: “Comment of the Week: A Call for Civility
  • Polaski’s only source underlying the events in Vancouver was the aforementioned item by Browning, whose only sources underlying the events in Vancouver was the aforementioned Jan. 23, 2012 post in the website of Canada’s Xtra and the aforementioned blog post by Joe Jervis, whose only source underlying the events in Vancouver was the aforementioned Jan. 23, 2012 post in the website of Canada’s Xtra.
  • Polaski subsequently updated his post to reflect the dubious nature of the allegations of trans involvement in the events in Vancouver.
  • On Jan. 30, Joe Jervis, via Twitter, defended his Jan. 23 piece by asserting: “They are self-described ‘trans-activists’ which is exactly how I labeled them.”
  • On Jan. 31, Jervis demanded accountability from Chelsea Sayre, who in posting about the aforementioned tweet characterized Jervis as having taken to Twitter to argue against her own prior debunking of the Transcouver meme: “I did NOT ‘take to Twitter’ to debunk your fucking post, which I had not read. YOU tweeted ME out of the blue. Stop your fucking lying, you fucking liar.”

If you think that Bil Browning – or any of those whipping up anti-trans animosity, which oozes from the comments to the aforementioned gay blog posts, within the gay masses (I’m singling Bil out because he was alleged to have said, via a personal communication, that he was going to addreess this matter but that he just had too much on his plate; The John has long since proved that he simply doesn’t care about the difference between facts and his rabid desire to ensure that nothing gets in the way of what he wants, which is gay marriage) – has any inclination whatsoever to address the fact that we now know (which is aside from the question of whether Browning knew or cared on January 23) that the Xtra article at the far end of the link underlying the words “Dan Savage was glitterbombed again” in that Shillerico piece says nothing whatsoever about Dan Savage being glitterbombed in Vancouver by “trans activists” but instead says:

then perhaps you’ll be amused about what Bil Browning has had to say since Jan. 23 instead of addressing with the same ferocious, transphobia-seeding fabulosity that he played the “trans mafia” card on Jan. 23 the fact that we now know that the Xtra article at the far end of the link underlying the words “Dan Savage was glitterbombed again” in that Shillerico piece says nothing whatsoever about Dan Savage being glitterbombed in Vancouver by “trans activists.”

Yes, perhaps you’ll be amused…

But, if that’s all you are, then that means you haven’t been paying attention.

In a post about the incident today, Joe Jervis points his readers to an older Bilerico post by Austen Crowder called, “The ‘Trans Mafia’ Stifles Allies.” I sent him an email to thank him for it.

And you might mistake “dumbassery” for accuracy, or…

…or the enabling of trans-exterminationism for being an ally.

It all depends on what the meaning of “dumbassery” is, eh?

Or, perhaps a better question is: What Would The John Do?

Ohh…

Never mind.

[T]he trans community created the environment in which the attacks on Dan have happened….

He’s already done it….

which means I think that, from this moment forward, every gay man and lesbian shall be deemed to be responsible for every anti-same-sex marriage constitutional amendment pushed through from 2004 onward – as well as a federal constitutional ban on same-sex marriage, should one ever come into force.

Ken Mehlman scoreboard.

Or would you prefer that of Dean Corll?

[Cross-posted at ENDABlog]

Transadvocate contributor: Kat  (208 Posts)


  • Kathy

    ========
    > Zoe Ellen Brain · Top Commenter · Ph.D. student / Assistant lecturer at Australian National University · 158 subscribers
    > Just had a PM from Bil. Summary: “Apparently I screwed up. I’m sorry. More later”
    >
    > That is why he’s my friend, and that is why I really have to object to people imputing malice towards him. I still disagree with him, we’ll talk on that later. But either he’s one of the good guys who doesn’t deserve vitriol just for a blunder, or I’m no better than he is. So take it out on me, not him, OK? He’ll post in it later, when not so overwhelmed with other issues.
    ——//—-

    All that’s required for evil to suceed is for good guys to remain silent. Of course – if you haven’t actually been silent – your responsibility is that much greater to speak.

    Miss Piggy’s pressing importance notwithstanding. It’s a week now – long past time for a response. Adam excluded, of course. It took him a few minutes to respond & make a correction.

    • Guest

      Adam shouldn’t be excluded. His entry still retains the “trans activist” tag.

  • Kathy

    Having just read Bil’s latest on the Dear Abby on the mafia:

    We all make mistakes; it’s a part of being human and fallible. But if you’re like most people, you feel terrible whenever it happens. The reason, as most business coaches and motivational experts will tell you, is that people mostly just want to do a good job. Studies in the past have shown that while money is a key factor in human performance levels, being appreciated for talent and hard work ranks even higher.

    It follows then, that when we don’t get it right the first time, or we let someone down, or we don’t meet expectations, we feel badly about it. Some people feel so badly that they block out this emotion, instead projecting the blame on others so they won’t have to face being imperfect.
    People who feel secure in themselves, however, have a different way of looking at mistakes. Instead of dwelling in them, or living in denial about them, or searching for a scapegoat, they are able to recognize and acknowledge when they’ve acted in error, correct the mistake, and recover.

    So, what do you do when you’ve tried your best, but things didn’t work out and now you’ve got a big mess to clean up?

    Answer: just clean it up and move

  • Kathy

     Bil Browning says:

    “By spinning the glittering of Savage into a trans vs gays issue,
    Rose is able to breed friction while attracting attention to herself.”

    Bil – your article’s poor reporting started an online pillorying of trans people (mostly trans women)  that became willful misreporting as the error was pointed out to you directly multiple times. Even one of your own contributors corrected the glaring factual error your stories (multiple by now) was based on. It beget a firestorm of trans slurs mostly by gay men on blogs run by gay men. These same people took no action to delete or denounce the torrent of slurs.

    And you try to shift responsibility for breeding friction on to those who responded to your actions.

    In the meantime -more  trans women get murdered – one gay guy who supported glittering is apparently not very worried he’ll get glittered. The equivalence of harm is indeed glaring.

    The murdered women has many of the same sorts of slurs used by the guys on those blogs towards trans women used by her attacker and the media reporting on her murder.
    And you think this indicates someone else is to blame.

    Since you seem to be channeling someone again – let’s take a stroll down memory lane:

    =========================”Upon further reflection and deliberation

    Filed By Bil Browning | December 11, 2009 8:50 PM | 190 comments

    Filed in: Site News
    Tags: Bilerico Project, Ronald Gold

    The Bilerico Project editorial team has unanimously decided to remove
    Ronald Gold’s contributor status and have taken down his previous post
    from the site. We regret that his words have caused so much hurt to so
    many in our community.”
    =======================

    Fae Wayard | December 11, 2009 9:06 PM

    Good.

    What’s next? Gold’s post was a spectacular failure – not only
    Offensive but downright Dehumanizing, but the greater tragedy was the
    editorial policy that enabled and promoted it. How is that going to
    change?===============

    Mara Keisling | December 11, 2009 9:10 PM

    Bil,

    Thank you. I think taking the post down was the right decision.
    Dehumanizing material that further marginalizes any group of people
    doesn’t belong on a site like this.

    Mara
    ========================

    Matt Smith |
    December 12, 2009 8:27 PM

    Gay White male here, educated, financially comfortable, FWIW.

    In the LGBT community, gay white (insert other dominant identities
    here) men have the most privilege. We end up having disproportionate
    money and influence because of it, tend to care most about the issues
    that affect gay White men, and relax once we’ve got ours. Any group
    with privilege tends to do this. Not every member of the group, but on
    average.

    But the way to a more just society is not “Every man for himself!”
    It’s concerning ourselves with each others’ issues in addition to our
    own. And I believe we’re all obligated to pursue a more just society
    for all. So I appreciate the criticism that a White gay etc man who’s
    ignorant and influential is part of a much larger problem, and should
    get educated of his own volition – particularly if his ignorance is ever
    brought to his attention, and particularly if he’s in a position where
    his grasp of trans issues matters, such as a regular contributor to a
    trans-inclusive website who decides to address trans identity.

    I could nitpick how she said it, but the thrust of her critique is spot on.

    ======================

    Matt Smith | December 12, 2009 10:26 AM

    With all respect, I think you mistake what’s at issue here.

    The real question raised by the community’s reaction is not about how
    controversial someone can get here, or how much heat people can take in
    the kitchen. It’s about the power dynamics between cis and trans
    people – what it means for a cis-dominated trans-inclusive publication
    to give a platform to a trans-basher – and why y’all didn’t see it
    coming as cis leaders of an LGBT community space. This should be a
    learning opportunity about what it means to be an ally to an oppressed
    population. I hope you’ll examine it in that light! You’ll be better
    allies for it.

    I appreciate the speed of the editorial board’s response, because I’m
    guessing that reflects your commitment to maintaining a trans-inclusive
    community space.

    -==================You fucked up big time. Fix it.  

  • Pingback: Answer: Fact-Free Blogging « ENDAblog

  • Pingback: Answer: Fact-Free Blogging | The Transadvocate

  • Pingback: Countdown to Shillerico’s Inevitable ‘Trans Kiwi Mafia’ Post: 3…2…1…. | The Transadvocate

  • Pingback: Maybe He Should Have Just Called it a ‘Trans Activist’ instead of the ‘Cornhusker Kickback’ | The Transadvocate