<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aravosis: Whitewashing The Transgender Movement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.transadvocate.com/aravosis-whitewashing-the-transgender-movement.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.transadvocate.com/aravosis-whitewashing-the-transgender-movement.htm</link>
	<description>a blog for every advocate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobi</title>
		<link>http://www.transadvocate.com/aravosis-whitewashing-the-transgender-movement.htm/comment-page-1#comment-945</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 05:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transadvocate.com/hrc/aravosis-whitewashing-the-transgender-movement.htm#comment-945</guid>
		<description>Can you clarify your point on trans(s)exual?  I&#039;ve been under the impression that the removal of the second &#039;s&#039; was an attempt to take the word back from the medical community.  In fact, googling transexual led me to an urban dictionary entry that stated just that.

I generally just use &#039;trans&#039; to skip having to make the transexual, transsexual, transgender distinctions, but when I do want to use the term trans(s)exual, I tend to do so with only one &#039;s&#039; for the reason above.  Is there some reason why I shouldn&#039;t be doing that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you clarify your point on trans(s)exual?  I&#8217;ve been under the impression that the removal of the second &#8216;s&#8217; was an attempt to take the word back from the medical community.  In fact, googling transexual led me to an urban dictionary entry that stated just that.</p>
<p>I generally just use &#8216;trans&#8217; to skip having to make the transexual, transsexual, transgender distinctions, but when I do want to use the term trans(s)exual, I tend to do so with only one &#8216;s&#8217; for the reason above.  Is there some reason why I shouldn&#8217;t be doing that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobi</title>
		<link>http://www.transadvocate.com/aravosis-whitewashing-the-transgender-movement.htm/comment-page-1#comment-5805</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transadvocate.com/hrc/aravosis-whitewashing-the-transgender-movement.htm#comment-5805</guid>
		<description>Can you clarify your point on trans(s)exual?  I&#039;ve been under the impression that the removal of the second &#039;s&#039; was an attempt to take the word back from the medical community.  In fact, googling transexual led me to an urban dictionary entry that stated just that.

I generally just use &#039;trans&#039; to skip having to make the transexual, transsexual, transgender distinctions, but when I do want to use the term trans(s)exual, I tend to do so with only one &#039;s&#039; for the reason above.  Is there some reason why I shouldn&#039;t be doing that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you clarify your point on trans(s)exual?  I&#8217;ve been under the impression that the removal of the second &#8216;s&#8217; was an attempt to take the word back from the medical community.  In fact, googling transexual led me to an urban dictionary entry that stated just that.</p>
<p>I generally just use &#8216;trans&#8217; to skip having to make the transexual, transsexual, transgender distinctions, but when I do want to use the term trans(s)exual, I tend to do so with only one &#8216;s&#8217; for the reason above.  Is there some reason why I shouldn&#8217;t be doing that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kat</title>
		<link>http://www.transadvocate.com/aravosis-whitewashing-the-transgender-movement.htm/comment-page-1#comment-943</link>
		<dc:creator>Kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 23:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transadvocate.com/hrc/aravosis-whitewashing-the-transgender-movement.htm#comment-943</guid>
		<description>Aravosisism: Equal parts bigotry and falsified history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aravosisism: Equal parts bigotry and falsified history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kat</title>
		<link>http://www.transadvocate.com/aravosis-whitewashing-the-transgender-movement.htm/comment-page-1#comment-5804</link>
		<dc:creator>Kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 23:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transadvocate.com/hrc/aravosis-whitewashing-the-transgender-movement.htm#comment-5804</guid>
		<description>Aravosisism: Equal parts bigotry and falsified history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aravosisism: Equal parts bigotry and falsified history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bilerico Project</title>
		<link>http://www.transadvocate.com/aravosis-whitewashing-the-transgender-movement.htm/comment-page-1#comment-944</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bilerico Project</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 18:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transadvocate.com/hrc/aravosis-whitewashing-the-transgender-movement.htm#comment-944</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Aravosis: Whitewashing The Transgender Movement...&lt;/strong&gt;

When Barney Frank decided to remove gender identity out of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, the GLBT community responded on an unbelievable scale. Most of the community has been positive about this, but there are some detractors of the “ENDA, n...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Aravosis: Whitewashing The Transgender Movement&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>When Barney Frank decided to remove gender identity out of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, the GLBT community responded on an unbelievable scale. Most of the community has been positive about this, but there are some detractors of the “ENDA, n&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

